The Four Spent the Day Together by Chris Kraus β A Renowned Writer Ventures Into Something New
This latest work centers on characters seeking new beginnings, struggling to escape addictions or toxic relationships, only to witness hope devolve into aggression. Kraus repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", rendering it intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They decided to make a fresh start" appear throughout the narrative. At the same time, the author herself seems to be making her personal new beginning, as this seems a novel form of writing β fact-based, authentically narrative. But then it turns out to be laden with the same dilemmas and aesthetics as past novels.
From Unplanned Author to Cult Classic
The writer was originally an visual artist who transitioned to writing almost accidentally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, made up of missives to a distant beloved, transforming confessional female writing from humiliation into assassination. She kept producing books, but the three subsequent fascinating and rebarbative novels lacked the shock and immediacy that the letter form brought to the tone of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her identity as a renegade artist who had become a extensive real estate holder, so there was much discussion on real estate deals. It is logical that she presently aims to experiment with different types of content, looking outwards to external narratives, at a time when she states that Trumpian politics renders personal narrative redundant.
Several Eras, One Unescapable Past
The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing several time periods β none able to break free from their pasts. The book includes the tale of characters Emma and Jasper, versions of the author's parents, moving from the urban environment to a pastoral setting. Then there is the account of Kraus, in the character of Catt Greene, reckoning with the late recognition of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her addict husband Paul. The third thread involves the account of a killing of one lost young man by another in a community mostly forsaken by progressive politics only 80 miles from Catt's cottage in the Minnesota countryside.
As a reader attracted to honed writing of the kind Kraus herself tends to eschew, I was captivated by the narrative style of the initial segment.
As someone who reads who favors crafted language of the kind that the author usually avoids, I was won over by the literary tone of the initial part. It possesses a novel degree of detail that accommodates minutiae, like the pail that the youthful Catt frees from the ice at the opening of the book, aided by her cherished parent. "Look, an ice toy!" she exclaims; "a nice toy", he answers, "the nuanced interpretations of terms circulating in their speech like hard candy". The author narrates the tale of Emma with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream β not precisely her dream."
Letdown and Fragmentation
I was destined to be disappointed when I hoped this fresh tone could continue through the novel. The author states here that she resents the pleasure readers like me have gotten from I Love Dick; she's devoted to disruption, to the untidy aesthetics she shares with her idol writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels reasserts itself in the central part. Catt is trying to renovate multiple decrepit residences in the city's most challenging districts while shuttling between the Midwest and the West Coast, unable to aid her husband manage his alcohol use. She experiences powerlessness as Paul cycles through poorly supported positions as an substance abuse counselor in a world propelled by the anger and fear that drives Trump's victory. There are several pages about Catt's social media ostracism on social media, her professional designation altered from "author" to "property owner" on Wikipedia. Kraus still seems to invest excessive emotion about this. On one occasion she states that she's investigating the murder so that before leaving Minnesota, "she might be able to learn something about an the nation that her Twitter detractors would not understand, would not even perceive".
The Murder Narrative
Then we reach to the homicide in question β and the titular day experienced by the murdered individual with the murderer and his companions. Kraus utilizes compelling foundational content, and details moment by moment what happened when a man named Brandon came to visit Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He sought a sexual encounter but seems affably to have spent the day in the company of her associates, wandering about fixing his automobile and covering the cost of food and substances, before being murdered by Brittney's partner a man named Micah β a individual with mental health challenges who has repeatedly received inpatient care for aggressive outbursts.
Fascination and Incompletion
The protagonist becomes fixated by the narrative, and I found myself captivated by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards accurate chronicling and daring boundary-pushing wrestle in this part. However, I would have preferred her to delve deeper into her own obsessions here. The standout figure is the character Brittney, who gains dimension partially because of Catt's identification with her β another bright, bullied girl derailing in a troubled, forgotten town. Kraus tells us that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in jail, but she omits the dramatization of these talks. The whole section feels oddly unfinished, to the extent that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par